Wednesday, 21 March 2012

Nothing!



Well, I know this blog is called whats annoying Jack?, but to be honest there's not a lot bothering me right now!

As many of you will know, that is because my beautiful girlfriend Katherine has given me a beautiful son, who we've called Bobby.

Biased or not, he is absolutely brilliant and he is very alert already, making his mum and I very happy!

Robert (Bobby) Samuel Wilson was born on 16th March, 2012, and he weighed in at a very healthy 8 lbs and 12.5 oz, just 2.5 oz less than his mum weighed when she was born, and perhaps a few less than his dad...

I would also like to use this blog as an opportunity to congratulate Andrea and Tim Parks on the birth of Elijah Ryan Parks! We knew they were due shortly after us so it's great that he has arrived healthy as well!

So to all mums and dads, past, present and future, I'd just like to say either keep at it, congratulations or good luck, because for me personally it's been a hard journey to get here but Bobby has made it all worthwhile and no mistake!

And that's why nothing is annoying Jack!


Thursday, 29 December 2011

Holiday Season

How odd that the ONLY thing that annoys me about the holiday season is the fact that people call it the holiday season nowadays and not Christmas! So infuriating!

Merry Christmas!

Tuesday, 8 March 2011

Art...

What an odd thing to be coming back to a long blogging absence to be annoyed by you might say, but seriously, what is our government playing at?

I was listening intently to the Stephen Nolan show this morning, as I'm sure many of you do, and this doll called Rita something or other came on to say, and I quote (I think) verbatim...

"Art is the only thing that will get the world out of this"

The "this" she referred to was the mire that is the world we live in. The chaos in the middle east, the financial crises that engulf the western world, war, famine, injustice. She referred to everything and more being "solved" by simply appreciating Art? Now I love art, don't get this article confused with an attack on art because it simply is not, I love it. (When they re-opened the Ulster Museum on Stranmillis I was one of the first through the doors on the re-opening day) and apart from the painting being horrendous the rest of the exhibitions were great. (They have now put better paintings in THANK GOODNESS!)

But I do have a problem with someone who thinks Art can solve all our problems, and to hell with the costs. What a completely looney idiot! She went on to say that Art is reflecting people back on themselves, so they can learn from and move forward from their mistakes. Excellent idea Madame, I must remember to pack my statue of Col. Muammar Gaddaffi executing one of his own people next time I travel to Libya. I'm sure when he stands back and appreciates the grandeur of my design, he will instantly see the error of his ways, apologise and make way for the next elected leader.

Then I can wake up and have my cornflakes.

Rita, if anyone sees this who knows you, I hope they hit you a quare slap! Ridiculous notions and ideals will not save the planet, however much you "appreciate" art!

The above part is just the scene setter for this rant by the way, I'm getting to the point now. The Newry and Mourne council have just spent £50,000, yes FIFTY THOUSAND POUNDS on a stupid statue of some fishermen for Kilkeel. Now I'm no fiscal expert, far from it, but are they mental? What councillors are making these decisions? If I had 50K sitting around I wouldn't be putting it in a flipping well art exhibition. Surely the Newry and Mourne council have better things to spend money on?

A country on it's knees financially, cuts going every which way, hitting everyone, and here's the councils throwing money at some la-tee-da notion of Art improving the state of the tourist industry in Kilkeel? I doubt it very much. When they decide on their next topic I will submit my tender and design them a wee plaque that says this...



"NEWRY AND MOURNE COUNCIL. MONEY WASTERS EXTRAORDINAIRE SINCE 2011"


Oh, and because it will be etched on 24 Carat Gold and decorated in Diamonds and Rubies, it will automatically become "Art" and will cost them £200,000 for the priviledge. Which given their current run of form with their finances I imagine they will think is fantastic value.


The Lunatics have well and truly taken over the asylum, burnt it, and built a monstrosity of a housing development on it.

And even now, they are suffering from negative equity. Fantastic.

Sunday, 26 April 2009

The state of this country!

I can't actually understand where it all went wrong with this country, was it destined to happen no matter what government we had or is just "not-so-new" labour making a mockery of our taxes?

Answers on a postcard

Wednesday, 25 March 2009

Jade Goody

Let me start off by saying I wouldn't wish what she went through on my worst enemy, and my heartfelt and sincere sympathy goes to her sons, 3 and 5 years old, who now have to live without their mother. Heartbreaking.

I do however, find headlines such as "Our Jade" and, pick of the bunch, "The Princess of Essex" a little too tongue in cheek for my liking because I feel that they are so exaggerated that it's embarrassing for the people who felt the need to write them. Princess of Essex? Seriously? This girl was as thick as two short planks, racist and naive, a loud mouthed tube who the nation loved to laugh at and/or be disgusted by, and yet, when she has to undergo a brutal, debilitating illness that takes her young life, suddenly the whole country thinks she's a national treasure? Well I'm sorry but no way no how. David Cameron should have scoffed in the faces of whoever it was who quoted him as saying she was an "inspiration to all young women out there"- was he being sarcastic there? She must inspire all the Vicky Pollard wannabes to crave fame at any cost and be completely susceptible to manipulation by publicity "guru's" such as Max "Mercenary Genius" Clifford.

I think it's fair to say I never liked Jade, or what she represented as piece of Broken Britain, but she did gain my respect somewhat with her cervical cancer campaign to get the screening age lowered. I hope it's successful and she is allowed that little legacy as testament to all she went through in her short life.

However, it was after this that some people dared to suggest that she could be compared to a "Diana from the wrong side of the tracks"! Say what? Now Jade Goody was many things but she was never another Princess Diana. I draw no similarities at all, but I do think it interesting that Diana died as a direct result of the Press following her every move, whereas Jade died HOPING the press would be following her every move and paying good money to do so.

So who are going to follow the coffin in the 21 car cavalcade that has been arranged for her funeral? Surely only the likes of royalty ever need that many cars to fill with mourners? I was thinking they could have a new reality t.v show called "how much did YOU love Jade?" and get random members of the public to perform like ignorant idiots to deem which one wanted to be at the funeral most? No? Just as well, because I imagine that those 21 cars will be full of utter losers trying to gain column inches for themselves simply by being there. I feel bad for her husband Jack also because he has to mourn not with family but with a bunch of strangers, most of whom never met let alone liked his short-lived bride!

In summary, the whole nation's "grief" shows us much more about the curse of Celebrity on our social structure as it does about a poor Essex girl who found fame and fortune but alas all that she ever dreamed of couldn't keep her alive one minute longer than if she'd still been poor and unknown.

It makes me sad. :(

Wednesday, 21 January 2009

The New President

Okay, first things first, I'm not slating Barack Obama, he seems a nice bloke, but I do have a few concerns over his election and now his forthcoming term in Office.

Firstly, the headlines proclaiming him as a Saviour of America are very annoying. He may well be a very charismatic, gifted orator, but it will take nothing short of an absolute miracle to get America and the rest of the worlds Economies out of the mess they have been allowed to get into, not to mention the two wars they continue to fight.

Yes, he could save them BILLIONS of dollars by pulling US troops out of Iraq, but he has already said in pre-election interviews and debates that he personally feels another troop SURGE is needed in Afghanistan, so where there will be a saving, there will be another loss.

Secondly, all the people who said his election was a victory for democracy, was it really? I'm sorry but you can't hide the fact that there were more black people who voted than in any other time in their history (there was another black candidate before Obama, I can't remember his name, he did not gain many votes) so you cannot say that in many of the so-called "Swing" states this didn't influence the result? Come on. Yes, people voted in their millions, but people who otherwise wouldn't have bothered voting for a Democrat WHITE senator put their considerable weight behind a BLACK senator.

It was a result of a feeling of oppression that clearly still runs very deep in the African American psyche that they felt they had to vote now or lose their chance of a black president for another 4 years minimum. The fact that they got a candidate who was both Eloquent and Charming was a bonus. I honestly think that he could have had half his charisma and still been elected.

He was also helped, let's not forget, by the low-level his opponents set him. John McCain, an all-round decent bloke but ageing faster than the speed of sound and his inept-but-loveable sidekick Sarah Palin, who truly it appears, was the result of putting lipstick on a pig and a pitbull and then letting them mate. She was, to put it mildly, horrendous. As a politician she lacked experience, as a person she lacked charm, and as a candidate for the vice-presidency she lacked overall appeal.

McCain would have had a fighting chance with nearly anyone else. Democrat cynics rightly (for once) I feel picked up on the fact that she was picked almost solely because they wanted the feminist vote. Poor timing given that in a straight sprint there will always be more racists than misoginists!

Again, he wasn't exactly replacing Abraham Lincoln either, it was George W Bush Jnr. OFFICIALLY the most denounced and hated president of all time by many accounts, and officially with the title of Lowest EVER approval ratings for a president leaving office. Then there was the itch factor, the fact that a republican had been in office for 8 years, so many people will just have fancied a change and voted democrat whether it was Barack Obama in the hot seat or not.

All that aside, I very honestly have to wish him well for us forthcoming presidency, really I do.

I hope I'm proved majestically wrong and that his term will be remembered as one of new hope and promise, where old mistakes were righted and new policies greeted with cries of approval from all around. But I feel I will not be reading this is 4 years and thinking I was completely mistaken, because I think there is far too much pressure being put on President Obama's shoulders right from the start, stirring though his Inaugural speech may have been.

JK

Monday, 7 April 2008

Robert Mugabe!

Talk about not wanting to just give in!

He's obviously been beaten in the polls in Zimbabwe, and yet he hangs on to power just that little bit longer, I mean why bother? If he just leaves, they may not even exile him.

I imagine he probably doesn't want to die alone in Saudi like Amin did years after he was forced out of Uganda.

His regime has been a terrible injustice on an economy which wasn't exactly healthy before he came to power and is now almost beyond repair. Britain, credit where credit is due, have offered an aid package of £1 billion providing he is removed from power first, but to be honest this is the biggest guilt payment I've seen in ages, if they hadn't sanctioned and helped the minority white government to bully the black people for so long then they wouldn't have voted in such a controversial figure as their President.

As far as the European Union were concerned, the biggest threat Mugabe posed was to Travellers, not to the many people killed under his regime, so no action was ever taken to try and remove him from power. His open hatred of Homosexuals and his virtuoso rascist ranting was enough to warrant sanctions from America and The EU, but not his orchestration of random murders of white farmers, or at the very VERY least, his tolerance of these acts.

Let's hope he moves out of the Presidential Palace imminently, and without incidents of violence.

Wednesday, 27 February 2008

More Legality issues!

And here we go again, it's been a while since I was IRKED by someone or something, but today was that day again.

It turns out that in order to DISCOURAGE anti-social behaviour, we shouldn't try young people until they are 16 or 18. What? That is absolutely ridiculous, so that if a 16 year old thug goes out and mugs or beats or even rapes someone, they are left untried as a juvenile and given rehabilitation instead? Gimme a break, a 16 year old person who does something like that should be tried as an adult and locked up, they can do thier rehab in Prison like all the other delinquents. Are the government seriosuly trying to suggest that a 16 year old doesn't understand right from wrong? The beauty of court is that every case is decided on it's merits, so if some 16 year old with learning difficulties, sociopathic tendencies or whatever comes in, perhaps the "He didn't know what he was doing" card can be played, but the government are seriously suggesting that the average 14-18 year old who commits a crime doesn't know right from wrong? Do me a favour.

And we have a minister for justice who thinks the world will be a safer place when we let all these young people go back on the streets virtually un-punished? We think ASBO's will sort them out? Please, a recent poll in Glasgow suggested that ASBO's are a badge of honour now, and some young people are actively trying to get one bestowed upon them!

The youth of today need role-models and a stern hand, not poncy beaurocrats a soft judicial system, Ridiculous.

Tuesday, 28 August 2007

Human Rights once again...

I can't believe my ears sometimes, the fact that some nut-jobs in government are still allowed their posts baffles me, they are so backward and bent in their way of thinking, allow me to expand on their latest epiphany.

It is now going to be classed as "Against their Human Rights" to hold DANGEROUS prisoners after their original sentence, even if they are considered dangerous. Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it, even freakin slightly, against MY human rights to set a dangerous prisoner free into the populace? I mean, what possible angle is the MP who thought this crap up coming from? Has he got a dangerous criminal brother being held behind bars or something, and he came up with this to get him out? I mean, WHAT?

I have to say, the PC/ Human Rights brigade are REALLY starting to get to me. I swear if you havent read George Orwell's 1984, you need to. It is not long before you will not be allowed to express your own opinion without being imprisoned for annoying someone who has a different one.

I hate this Government.

Wednesday, 1 August 2007

UN-AU Peacekeepers...

I was glad to hear that the UN finally stood up today and put forward a joint United Nations and African Union peacekeeping force for the Sudan. However, I still have reservations and I think they are not doing enough. Allow me to elaborate...

First and foremost, although it will be the largest peace-keeping force in the world, it will not be large enough. For those of you looking for facts and figures, allow me to save you googling them...

Fact: The UN-AU force will be 26,000 strong.
Fact: Over 2 Million people are already homeless refugees
Fact: At least (UN estimates are extremely conservative) 200,000 people are already known to have died in the last 4 years of conflict.
Fact: The first peace keepers will not arrive until october
Fact: The Sudanese government have been accused but not tried for War Crimes against their Black Population
Fact: It will cost the UN $2Billion/year to keep the force there.
Fact: They will not be able to shoot militants unless fired upon first or forced to protect civilians from being fired upon.
Fact: They will not have the power to seize unlicenced firearms and illegal weapons of any sort.
Fact: Only one actual "Peace" agreement has been signed, and that was only by two of four warring factions in the Sudanese Capital, Khartoum.
Fact: China actually has a veto over UN action in Africa, and nearly didn't pledge its support.

Basically, I think that if the UNAMID (United Nations and African unions Mission In Darfur) is going to be a success, it will require a few months of talks and negotiations, or there will not be a peace to keep. Too many people have already lost so much that a peace keeping force which is going to antagonise the militia and the government will do nothing but exacerbate the situation and require even more troops etc to be committed.

Again, let me stress that I am extremely glad the UN has finally acted, and I hope it is a good decision. I also hope that it is made for sound reasons, has a sound outcome and allows the people of the Sudan to build themselves back up and turn their countries fortunes around.

I just hope it works.

Friday, 13 July 2007

Gordon Brown...

I can't believe someone quite so boring could get the votes of all those labour back benchers and just walk into power. To be honest, I think he'll make a better PM than David Cameron, but he simply doesn't have that sickening English charisma that saw Big T through ten years in office, I don't think he'll get anywhere near that mark actually.

Another thing- did anyone see David Cameron "Rallying" the conservative troops to give TB a standing ovation? Oh the hilarity, what an absolute muppet. The man led us falsely into war, could well have faced criminal charges (and could yet if more evidence is found) in the cash for honours scam and blindly allowed his wife, the inimitable Cherie show, to go on tour with him and his north american monkey George.

All in all, a rather late but all too painfully relevant rant...

Wednesday, 27 June 2007

Multi-Culturalism...

First and foremost, I'm not a racist, nor do I condone racism in any way shape or form, but there are a few things I take issue with...

Firstly, the sheer number of immigrants to our society. We are rapidly becoming the most multi-cultural nation on earth simply by not doing a good enough job working out which people should be allowed in and which shouldn't. For example, let in Doctors, Nurses etc, people who can do skilled jobs which could benefit our ailing NHS, but don't let in hook-handed freakshows who are indangered in their own country for inciting violence so that they can incite violence against the very country who offers them respite and shelter from the inevitable hardships they would face back home.

Another annoying thing, especially true recently in Nortern Ireland, is the number of eastern europeans coming to work here. Now I have absolutely no problem with hard-working guys like that coming here and doing work, but if I want a factory job, the fact that it would help if I spoke polish really annoys me. I mean, if you're going to come here to work, learn English. You learn good english, and I'll get along with you fine. If I miss out on a job for not speaking a foreign language which isn't even taught in our schools? Then you and I will NOT get along fine.

Again, I am all for multi-culturalism, it enriches our society and instills a sense of pride that we are a nation where other people WANT to come to, but it is a dangerous thing to have borders which are too open. Illegal immigration is still rife in the waters around these islands and as such the prostitution, drugs and gun-dealing is still rife as well. If the government put half as much effort into stopping illegal people trafficking as it did into laws to allow MORE people to come in, then I wouldn't be writing this rant now.

There we have it- multi-culturalism is annoying me these days, and it should be annoying all like-minded people as well, because if we don't shut our borders at least a little, then we will soon have no culture left of our own, it will be lost in the quagmire of multi-culturalism for ever.

Especially here though, it seems to have given paramilitaries new focus. We can't attack the prods or catholics down the road now due to the peace process and cease fires etc, but we can all go and burn out the slovak family living at the end of the street, oh yes, perfect solution. What is it about these scumbags in Northern Ireland that feel they must always have a target? Someone to rob, intimidate or beat? This country is an annoying place to live in general...

Monday, 25 June 2007

Food Aid...

You know, I've been reading quite a bit about the world around me these last few days, and in so doing I have come to realise something- we are a nation of fat, greedy, stupid and ignorant people. Ignorant as in vulgar and ignorant as in unaware of the world around us.

At some point, we as a nation need to stand up and be counted. We need to intercede for those who cannot speak for themselves and we need to be heard where they are not. For example, the Famine in Sudan (see below for a rant). Here we are, in a totally utopian society by their standard of living and yet, we still see fit not to send them technology, or money, but rather food aid. Keeping the poor poor and allowing us to live with a clear(ish) conscience. Well, yet again folks, America is to blame.

Little known to the rest of the world is this- America has a clause in its food Aid Laws, that 80% of it MUST, by LAW, be sourced INSIDE the US's borders. That means that only 20% or less is grown by the poor of the world themselves. Now tell me I'm crazy if you want, but surely there must be a way we can help people climb out of poverty and still support our own farmers etc?

Britain, once again, and the EU indirectly, have taken the lead on this, and now 50% or more of EU food aid is grown in the countries it is destined for. Look at it this way- it is easier, cheaper and more effective as a poverty remedy if grain grown two miles away is sold cheaply to rural communities, rather than grain grown 2000miles away being sent and taken by gangs, dictatorships and villains, making the poorest of the poor miss out yet again.

Sadly, due to America's COLOSSAL grains and corns industries, the EU give only 24% of international food aid. America give 71% or so, so we have a grand total of only 28% of food aid overall being grown in the countries so desperate to be growing their own food. I read in TIME magazine the other day that a "typical" american family will spend $370 on food per week, for a family of five. In Chad, where many sudanese refugees are now being settled, the average spend of a five person family for a week is $1.23cents, and that is with free water from Oxfam, and barely enough food to keep them alive. Naturally, American over-indulgence meant the american family spend most money on drinks- beer, coke, fruit juice etc, coming to nearly $122 alone. The tap water in America is safe, clean and free (perhaps unlike here for long) but they spent a third of their average weekly spend on drinks. Says a lot I reckon.

Again, german and french families where more conservative, spending closer to $200 apiece, but rememver that is equivalent to about £105 these days, so although they didn't feature a British Family, the french and german equivelent was close to where I would say the average family of 5 has their spending on groceries, perhaps a little less in the UK as our food is disproportionately cheap anyway (see Tesco for examples- beans at 8p, lemonade at 7p).

Back to the point though- if we were to give the poor of the world methods, farming equipment and advice on irrigation and dams, then we would be able to halve our food aid in no time, and although food aid is fantastic in times of famine (see Joseph when he was put in charge of grain in Egypt some 4000 years ago, find it at the end of Genesis, chapter 41 or thereabouts) it is not something which will somehow rescue the countries in need of it from the quagmire of poverty induced fatigue and loss of productivity.

Global Warming...

I was reading last night about Al Gore and his seemingly endless quest to have the major world-polluting-countries come together and assess and prevent global warming. The problem I have is not, obviously, with Al Gore, he is one of the "good guys", but with the rest of america and it's inability to see its own pollutants as a major cause, but would rather point to china (A population of over 1 billion) and their pollution, which although it is steadily catching America is still not as bad.

I am reminded of the proverb that Jesus once told, concerning our attitude to each other, and it is the same for world leaders- "First remove the plank from your own eye, then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your friends eye". I forget where it's found in the bible, but go through the Gospels, it's there, honestly.

I was hearing the day before yesterday that China is now building a staggering 2 power plants EVERY WEEK. To put that into perspective, thats enough power to keep inner city LONDON running EVERY WEEK by a long long way. Or, the equivalent to 2 MILLION more cars on the road per year.

Lets look at that shall we- 2 M cars per plant, 2 plants per week, 52 weeks in a year- thats 208MILLION more cars on the road this time next year, just from china alone, and thats conservative hoping they don't INCREASE production. Production of what I hear you ask? Well, our out-sourced telecoms industry call centres need power. Our cheap labour markets and sweat shops need power. Our computer building and production centres need power. Basically, China is polluting the world currently not for its own benefit, but for our greed. And that has got to be annoying world leaders such as Britain and America if only for the fact that it is clear they are the cause of most of this problem but it is also becoming imminently clear that whilst they are the problem, they do not have a solution, and it would seem mighty hypocritical (thats what governments are for after all) to tell China to cut down when America (The UK did) cannot even stick to it's 2005 Kyoto agreement with any degree of integrity.

America has a problem- It wont cut down on its own emissions, but it would like to tell everyone else to do the same thing. Here we are then- ACTIONS speak louder than WORDS. If America could see fit to reduce their emissions by even 5%, or at the VERY LEAST, level the emissions at the rate they are now, then surely that would lend credence to whatever they wanted to tell China? As in, don't do what we did then, do what we're doing now.

I hope China takes the UK's lead and not the dumbass Americans who simply cannot control themselves when it comes to telling other people how to rule their countries.

Wednesday, 9 May 2007

Fat, useless gits who sponge off everyone...

We all know the type, fat messes who eat so much they get too fat to work and it ends up being more profitable for them to actually sponge off the honest, tax paying people of this country rather than lose weight and get a job.

Wife swap (awful show that it is) had a great example of this, when a sponger's wife swapped with a middle class, hard working mum, and the hard working mum realised when she looked at the money coming in in benefits etc that despite the fact she and her husband were both working FULL time, they had less coming in that Mr Slob, who was recieving a few "dubious" benefits as well as his basic dole.

She broke down crying, as well she might, and was utterly aghast that someone who gave NOTHING to the country supporting him was actually given not just a free ride, but the mother of all free rides in that he was actually earning around 32K a year FOR BEING A LAZY FAT BEAST.

Absolutely flippin unbelievable how bad this country is that we can reward the lazy, punish the earnest, reward the rich and punish the poor. I hate the government, I hate this country, and I especially hate fat lazy gits who do nothing for anyone but expect everything from everyone.

Idiot Claims...

I'll admit I may have touched on this before, but I suspect it is now worthy of its own little chapter, so here goes...

I am all in favour of people who deserve compensation getting compensation, but people who are injured via pure stupidity, or issue needless, fraudulent claims to try n get money for nothing, are absolutely ridiculous, and should be issued with the costs of their stupid court cases instead, that would harden them. All these "No win, No fee" cases would be fantasticly reduced if it was "Win or Lose, we'll take you for half of it or 10K, whichever is more!" wouldn't they?

I cannot stand the governments stance on this, allowing all these things to take up court time and, in all likelihood, simply line Lawyers, Barristers and Solicitors (No, I don't know the difference) pockets.

Filthy money grabbers the lot of them.

Tuesday, 8 May 2007

Gossip...

To be totally honest, this has to be the thing which annoys me beyond all measure. People who talk about other people, especially, but not always, behind their backs have to be replacing stupid people as the people I hate the most, I despise them in fact. I was going to try and inject some humour into this but it makes me too angry so I'm not going to bother.

It's like when people ask you about things, not because of a genuine interest in your welfare or state of mind but because they think you'll give them some sort of juicy little piece of common interest rubbish, which you can then tell others in hushed tones. It's often quite astonishing when you tell someone a secret as to how quickly it can become common knowledge, isn't it? "Don't tell anyone, but such and such happened to such and such the other day, don't say I told you", how annoying that sort of faux-honesty is. "Keep this between us, okay?" is supposed to mean DON'T TELL ANYONE! But most people these days just assume it means if you're going to tell someone, make sure it can't be traced back to you.

I really don't like people who ask specifically for Gossip when they would endear themselves to me a whole lot more by asking questions such as how are you instead. "Any goss?" isn't quite so personal is it?

Anyway, I have decided that I will be telling nothing to anyone for the foreseeable future, because as far as I can tell, I am the only person in the whole world who knows what it means to be told something in confidence and to keep it that way.

P.S. if you are a gossip, don't talk to me. I hate you.

Saturday, 5 May 2007

Speeding!

Guys (and girls) who do EXCESSIVE speeds all the time need locking up. That new t.v. spot they have is, well, a little too graphic, but all in all, I agree. I don't mind guys doing 80 down the motorway, but 60 in a 30 is a definate no-brainer. Even if good drivers are speeding, the un-expected can always occur, and when it does, the carnage is always going to be worse the faster the car is travelling at!

There is no excuse for driving stupidly fast on country roads, no excuse viable anyway. If I was a peeler I'd throw the book at anyone doing more than 10mph over any speed limit, I really would.

Anyway, I'm away to work.

Tuesday, 1 May 2007

Letigious Society!

Is it me or are we following America's lead when it comes to introducing legalities and frivalous claims into absolutely everything? You need only read my Americans post to see how I rate them as a civilisation, so I can't understand why we feel the need to make rods for our own backs and legislate for absolutely any number of daft things.

For example, that bint in America who got burnt by her coffee then sued McDonalds for a few MILLION dollars, could no one have just stood up and said "I'm sorry Mrs Dipshit, but you are actually just stupid and as such we are going to banish you to Antarctica where your dumbass antics will not (hopefully) endanger anyone else you idiot", and if not why not?

Years ago she would have accepted she was a bit slow and got on with her life, but no, not in claim culture America, she told her Lawyer and hey presto! A few million SPONGED dollars to live her life in stupid retirement. It was like giving a thug a million quid not to rob anyone else, just ridiculous. And the guy who put his Motor-Home into Cruise Control and then went in the back to make coffee, what a complete tool he was. Again, no-one told him he was a retard, so he expected a full on Auto-Pilot to kick in, and when he crashed because it didn't, who was to blame? He was dammit, him. But not in America! Oh no, the manufacturer should have told him there was yet to be a full-auto-pilot function and that cruise control would not actually control anything but the speed of his journey. What fools they were!

And now we are adopting this approach in the UK as well, love it! Now we can actually make our society even more dysfunctional with a few claims here and there for stupidity's sake. For example, a Kid falls over at a youth club. Big deal 10 or even 5 years ago, but now? Oh boy, you better have the best child-protection policy in the world or that kid who you MADE play football and who you MADE fall over his own feet will take you to the cleaners and there will be no-one to stand in his way. Disgusting.

Again, the point here is clear. We can either follow Americanised rules of civilisation, or we can invent our own where the clever, honest, hard-working people are rewarded, and the silly, dishonest, scrounging people are re-housed, in America, where they belong.

Gordon Brown needs to get Britain back on the rails, because we are already so far gone that soon there'll be no track to return to, and then we'll be a little colony of silly Americans...

Idiots in localised Government!

I was listening to the Nolan show this morning and it came on that these plonkers in the belfast city council could see no reason to prosecute a man who had two dangerous dogs in the belief that the treadmill he had was to exercise them when it was raining, not to train them for fighting. Funny then that they also saw no illegal goings on with the dog-fighting manuals, steroids and needles, the scars on both dogs and the poor surroundings they were kept in isn't it?

The dogs will be handed back at 3 o'clock today as there is no case to answer apparently. Well it will make sorry reading if either of said dangerous dogs is allowed to hurt a child or even kill one, and it will be totally down to some tools in local government being blind to the blindingly obvious facts in this case. Yet another example of something completely straightforward being made insanely complicated by beaurocratic idiots who feel they need extra work to justify their equally idiotic salaries.

Our local MP's and MLA's are actually paid for doing nothing most of the time, it's a flippin disgrace! How many people can positively say that their own MLA has enriched their lives in any way, shape or form? I can't, but I would still hate to see Sinn Fein as the biggest party, at least my idiots are unionist idiots, it would be a lot worse if they were nationalist idiots, of which there are plenty to choose from.

Dumbass officials make dumbass decisions, so I guess we're all partly to blame for this...